Sivaram Swami’s Modern Educated Liberated Female Secretary Threatens & Abuses a Poor Simple Devotee for Speaking the Truth in ISKCON

Hanuman Das’ only crime was that he copy pasted Sivaram Swami’s disciple’s (Krisztina Danka PhD) Krishna Lila Dasi’ self written Facebook comment where she declared herself to be SRS’s personal secretary. Few hours later, Krishna Lila Dasi called Hanuman Das, a

  • Scumbag (two times)
  • Moron
  • twisted head
  • dirt bag
  • and (his act as) disgusting

krishna lila dasi attack.png

all this just for telling everyone that SRS is a monk who had kept a young beautiful secretary with him for 15 year and traveled with her (she claims it waswith an entourage, not alone, who knows…).

I will ask the same question i asked in the Sacinandana-Bhanu Nandini Scandal:
SRS has thousands of disciples. Not every single is totally useless. For all the women in East Europe he had to choose a very young tall beautiful slim blue eyed blond girl to be his personal secretary for 15 years as he traveled with her (not alone allegedly) all over the world. WHY? no fat, ugly bhaktins around?

How is that these two monks Sacinandana Swami and Sivaram Swami happen to just BY CHANCE make beautiful women their secretaries for 10 years and 15 years respectively?

Here are her comments


  • And if you do not delete the above post I will sue you. I am from a lawyer family with zero tolerance
    for scumbags.



    • Sue me about what? Sue me about my claim that sannyasis should not have short chats
      with women daily?
      And scumbag is who exactly? Everybody who doesn’t agree with your ridiculous ideas?
      Tell your guru that he should teach you how to lead polite discussion with devotees who are
      more than 25 years in this movement. I’ve never seen Sivarama Swami use words like “moron”, “twisted headed dirtbag” and “scumbag”. Now, you find yourself qualified, after using such words, to tell me that I am “offensive”.
      Please cook your lunch and send your husband to discuss with me.



      • I have been in this movement longer than you are, so I do not need you lecture me
        about Vaishnava etiquette. Vishnava etiquette requires me to reprimand those who
        commit grave Vaishnava aparadha just like you did! And yes, and
        Maharaja might not use those words but I do. You SCUMBAG!



  • That’s just disgusting!!! What an offensive, twisted-headed dirtbag you are! First of all, I was not the
    ONLY secretary he had, and we have NEVER EVER traveled alone, there was always a full team
    going with him everywhere. And the nature of our daily contact is mostly short chats about practical
    issues — I live an ocean apart with my husband and daughter, and sometimes I help the Hungarian
    ISKCON with information or advice. That’s all, so back off, morons!



    • First of wall, calling other people morons and twisted-headed dirtbag just because they
      don’t agree on your definition of sannyasi asrama shows serious lack of PR abilities.
      Sannyasis have no business doing daily chat about practical issues with their female
      secretaries. We don’t find Bhaktisiddhanta doing daily short chats with women. And we don’t find such behaviour in Srila Prabhupada.
      What happens when all other sannyasis and brahmacaries start having “short chats
      about practical issues”? So, it’s bad example.
      Feel free to continue with such practice, and I am feeling free to disagree with such



      • You are mistaken, man. Prabhupada had tons of daily conversations with his female
        disciples. There are about two dozens of them living in my neighborhood who can testify for that. You can “disagree” as much as you like but facts are facts. If you think short chats about 10,000 miles apart about Food For Life results,
        video projects, preaching events, articles that just appeared would compromise
        anyone’s ashram, than I am afraid something is terribly wrong in YOUR head.
        Stop demonize women and projecting your filthy mind on other people’s lives!



        • Something is wrong in my head? That’s because I read Bhagavad-gita:
          There are so many rules and regulations to be followed in the renounced
          order of life. Most important of all, a sannyāsī is strictly forbidden to have
          any intimate relationship with a woman. He is even forbidden to talk with a
          woman in a secluded place. Lord Caitanya was an ideal sannyāsī, and
          when He was at Purī His feminine devotees could not even come near to offer their respects. They were advised to bow down from a distant place. This is not a sign of hatred for women as a class, but it is a stricture
          imposed on the sannyāsī not to have close connections with women.
          One has to follow the rules and regulations of a particular status of life in
          order to purify his existence. For a sannyāsī, intimate relations with women
          and possession of wealth for sense gratification are strictly forbidden.
          The ideal sannyāsī was Lord Caitanya Himself, and we can learn from
          His life that He was very strict in regards to women. (BG 16.3p)
          So, Prabhupāda says we can learn from Caitanya Mahaprabhu.




Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This is a non-gaudiya math, non-ritvik, pro-bookedits, pro-JAS, anti-feminism, anti-egalitarianism website for Iskcon members under the GBC(in principle). All anti-iskcon persons remove your demoniac presence from my site! Haribol! TY!

%d bloggers like this: