lady should get a husband, behave like a lady, and not come in the middle of men and then speak blasphemies and be expected to be treated like lady. ladies are not less than 4th class who philosophize homosex.
Krishna killed a demoness, He wasn’t a gentleman?
Atleast Putana was not so crooked that she took shelter of misquotes and condemned Krishna for attacking a “lady”. But iskcon-liberal-feminists are the stool of putana. Atleast putana was straight forward. Putana never took the shelter of SP’s/vyasa’s books to condem Krsna’s acts and then sent her agent to make a scene about Krsna not being a gent! STOOL OF PUTANA!
What lady condones homosex using SP’s words?
And an idiot who fails to mark the difference between a lady and a less than 4th class person is himself less than 4th class. sams stuta purushah pashu
Prabhupada: They are discussing in the university homosex. They are advanced. Advancement of education. Just see. They are not even fourth-class men; they are animals, producing so many animals, that’s all, dogs and hogs. …in the beginning samah. Samah, damah—first two business. Control the sense and keep the mind undisturbed. That is the beginning. Now they are so much sexually disturbed, they’re discussing about the profit of homosex. Where is first-class men?
Amogha: They say that homosex keeps the balance of things because…
Prabhupada: Yes, fourth-class man can say anything wrong, bad, but we are not going to hear of it. A fourth-class man’s philosophy, we will have to waste our time to hear them—that’s not good. They are not even fourth class; they are animal class. Fourth class has got some position, but they are naradhama, the lowest of the mankind. So what is their philosophy, and who is going to spoil his time to hear about their philosophy? (Morning Walk Conversation with Srila Prabhupada—May 14, 1975, Perth)
original post here